A Bloodline Broken in Silence: The Erwin Incest Case
Narrative Case Story
For years, the truth inside a quiet North Carolina household remained sealed behind loyalty, fear, and a family structure that appeared ordinary from the outside. In Erwin, a small town where routines blur into familiarity and neighbors rarely expect the unimaginable, a father and daughter lived under the same roof while an alleged secret grew darker with time.
According to law enforcement statements, the case began not with a dramatic arrest, but with a disclosure. A young woman—later identified as Mackenzie Elizabeth Hicks—came forward and told authorities that the man who raised her, Julius Grant Jackson, had sexually abused her beginning when she was still a child. She reportedly stated the abuse began around the age of thirteen, a period when identity is still forming and power dynamics are profoundly uneven. What investigators would later uncover suggests that the alleged abuse did not stop as she aged, but continued into her late teens and early adulthood.
The case remained fragile from the start. Hicks reportedly expressed deep conflict about involving the criminal justice system. Despite giving an account to investigators, she later conveyed that she did not want her father charged. This hesitation, according to officials, stalled immediate prosecution and reflects a pattern often seen in long-term familial abuse cases—where emotional dependence, fear of retaliation, guilt, and manipulation can coexist with trauma.
Months later, the situation escalated in a way that could no longer be contained. Hicks became pregnant. According to information later discussed in court filings, concerns about the child’s paternity were raised by family members, triggering renewed law enforcement involvement. What followed would ultimately transform a private allegation into a criminal case with far-reaching consequences.
The Victim at the Center
Mackenzie Elizabeth Hicks is not just a defendant in this case—she is also the person at the center of the allegations that brought it to light. Her reported disclosure places her as a minor at the time the alleged sexual abuse began. That distinction matters deeply, not just emotionally, but legally and ethically.
When Hicks reportedly came forward, she was no longer a child. Yet the history she described, if proven, traces back to a period when she was legally incapable of consent. Investigators have indicated that her statements suggested a prolonged and complex relationship shaped by authority, dependency, and fear rather than choice.
The birth of her son changed the trajectory of the case. According to official records, DNA testing later confirmed that the child’s biological father was Julius Grant Jackson. That finding reframed the situation from allegation to evidentiary crisis. The infant, born into a lineage that should have offered protection, instead became the living proof of an alleged crime that spanned years.
Child protective services became involved to ensure the safety of the baby. Authorities have stated that the child is now being cared for by responsible adults, though details about custody arrangements have not been publicly disclosed.
The Case Unfolds Further
Once the DNA results were confirmed, law enforcement moved swiftly. Investigators obtained warrants and attempted to locate both Jackson and Hicks. When officers attempted to stop the pair, they reportedly fled together in a vehicle. The pursuit led to additional charges and intensified public concern, particularly after officers recovered multiple loaded firearms from the vehicle.
The discovery of weapons raised questions about intent, fear, and desperation. Authorities have not publicly stated why the weapons were present or whether they were legally owned, but their presence escalated the seriousness of the encounter.
Both individuals were arrested and booked into custody. Bonds were set at unusually high amounts, reflecting both the gravity of the allegations and concerns raised during the attempted flight. Court records indicate that the case is now moving through the Harnett County court system, with hearings scheduled and prosecutors continuing to evaluate potential additional charges.
What Investigators Have Confirmed
According to law enforcement and court filings, the following has been officially confirmed:
Investigators received an initial report from Hicks alleging long-term sexual abuse by her father, beginning when she was approximately thirteen years old.
DNA testing confirmed that Julius Grant Jackson is the biological father of Hicks’ infant son.
Both Jackson and Hicks were arrested after fleeing from law enforcement during an attempted stop.
Multiple loaded firearms were recovered from the vehicle involved in the attempted flight.
Julius Grant Jackson faces multiple felony charges, including incest and offenses related to fleeing and resisting law enforcement.
Mackenzie Elizabeth Hicks also faces felony incest-related charges connected to the investigation.
Bonds for both defendants were set in the millions.
The case remains active, and authorities have stated that additional charges may be filed as the investigation continues.
Unanswered Questions
-
What circumstances allowed the alleged abuse to continue for years without earlier intervention?
-
What role, if any, did other adults in the household or extended family play?
-
Were prior reports ever made to schools, medical providers, or social services?
-
Why did Hicks later express reluctance to pursue charges after initially coming forward?
-
How will the court address the dual role of Hicks as both alleged victim and defendant?
-
What long-term protections are in place for the child born as a result of the alleged abuse?
-
Could additional victims or related offenses still come to light?
Key Individuals and Relationships
Julius Grant Jackson - Father - Accused of long-term sexual abuse of his daughter and biological father of her child
Mackenzie Elizabeth Hicks - Daughter - Alleged victim of incestuous abuse and mother of the child confirmed through DNA testing
Infant Son - Child - Born from the alleged incestuous relationship and now under protective oversight
Family Members - Relatives - Individuals who reportedly raised concerns about the pregnancy and paternity
Law Enforcement Investigators - Authorities - Conducted the investigation, arrests, and evidence collection